Performer openness strategies and the discourse control procedures

Visualizações: 70

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33871/23179937.2023.11.2.7496

Keywords:

Performer-composer, Power relations, Discourse control procedures, Paulo de Assis, Critical analysis

Abstract

This article proposes a critical analysis of the composer/performer relationship based on the ‘emancipated performer’ by Paulo de Assis. The power mechanisms related to division of roles will be historically situated through Michel Foucault’s conceptions of discipline and sovereignty. Subsequently, we analyzed the methodological and artistic propositions based on the conception of Musical Work conceived by Assis. In order to understand the limits and contradictions of Assis approach, we draw parallels between the author’s approach and the discourse control procedures. We believe that such analytical allows us to understand the ordering, delimitation and exclusion mechanisms associated with discursive formations based on the composer/performer relationship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniel Pizaia, State University of Londrina

He holds a degree in music from the State University of Londrina (2019) and a master's degree in musicology from the Federal University of Paraíba (2022) in the line of History, Aesthetics and Phenomenology of Music. He carried out a Scientific Initiation focused on analysing Glenn Gould's recordings of the Goldberg Variations. In the master's degree, he sought to identify the norms and performative behaviours arising from creative processes linked to John Cage's indeterminacy, the study of composer/interpreter collaboration and the proposition about musical work found in the works of Paulo de Assis. He works as a collaborating member of the CLIC research project at the State University of Londrina, where he studies power relations in the fields of musical analysis and performance through elements of critical and archaeological analysis of Foucaultian matrix.

Fabio Furlanete, State University of Londrina

He holds a Bachelor's degree in Music, Composition from Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (1997), a Master's degree in Communication and Semiotics from Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (2000) and a PhD in Music from Universidade Estadual de Campinas (2010). He is currently an assistant professor at the State University of Londrina. He has experience in the area of Arts, with emphasis on Improvisation and Musical Composition, working mainly on the following themes: musical composition, electroacoustics, improvisation, interface and representation.

References

ASSIS, Paulo de. Logic of Experimentation: Rethinking Music Performance through Artistic Research. Ghent: Orpheus Institute, 2018a.

______________. (Intérpretes: ME21 Collective). Diabelli Machines8: after Ludwig van Beethoven’s Diabelli Variations, op.120. Ghent: Orpheus Institute, 2018b. 1 CD (63:03 min) e 1 DVD (87:00 min). Encarte em digital. Disponível em: <https://www.academia.edu/37373201/Diabelli_Machines_8_CD_and_DVD_>.

ATTALI, Jacques. Noise: the political economy of music. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009.

CARDASSI, Luciane. Time and Place within a performer-composer collaboration. In: MENDES, Jean Joubert Freitas. NODA, Luciana (Org.). Ensaios sobre a música do século XX e XXI: composição, performance e projetos colaborativos. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte: EDUFRN, 2016, p. 76-100.

_________________. Shared musical creativity: teaching composer-performer collaboration. Vórtex, Curitiba, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1-19, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33871/23179937.2020.8.1.13

CASTRO, Edgardo. Vocabulário de Foucault: um percurso pelos seus temas, conceitos e autores. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica Editora, 2009.

CLARKE, Eric Fillenz; DOFFMAN, Mark. Distributed Creativity: Collaboration and Improvisation in Contemporary music. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199355914.001.0001

D’ERRICO, Lúcia. Powers of Divergence: an experimental approach to music performance. Ghent: Orpheus Institute, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_1000228

DELEUZE, Gilles. Foucault. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 2013.

DOMENICI, Catarina. It takes two to tango: a prática colaborativa na música contemporânea. Revista do Conservatório de Música da UFPel, Pelotas, n. 6, p. 1-14, 2013.

DREYFUS, Laurence. Beyond the Interpretation of Music. Journal of Musicological Research, v.39, p. 1-26, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411896.2020.1775087

FOUCAULT, Michel. A arqueologia do saber. Tradução de Luiz Felipe Baeta Neves. 7° ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2005a.

_________________. Em defesa da sociedade. Curso no Collège de France (1975-1976). São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005b.

________________. O poder psiquiátrico. Curso no Collège de France (1973-1974). São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006a.

_________________. Poder-Saber. In: MOTTA, Manuel B. (Org). Ditos & Escritos IV: Estratégia, Poder-Saber. 2° ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2006b, p. 223-240.

_________________. A ordem do discurso. Aula inaugural no Collège de France, pronunciada em 2 de dezembro de 1970. 24° ed. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2014.

_________________. História da loucura na idade clássica. 11° ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2017.

GOEHR, Lydia. The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: an Essay in the Philosophy of music. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

____________. The Perfect Performance of Music and The Perfect Musical Performance. New Formation: performance matters, v. 27, p. 1-22, 1995.

GOOLEY, Dana. The Battle against Instrumental Virtuosity in the Early Nineteenth Century. In: GOOLEY, Dana; GIBBS, Christopher H. (ed.). Franz Liszt and His World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006, p. 75-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828616.75

HAYDEN, Sam; WINDSOR, Luke. Collaboration and the composer: case studies from the end of the 20th century. Tempo. Cambridge, v. 61, n. 240, p. 28-39, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0040298207000113

LEISTRA-JONES, Karen. Staging Authenticity: Joachim, Brahms, and the Politics of Werktreue performance. Journal of the American Musicological Society, v. 66, n. 2, p. 397-436, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jams.2013.66.2.397

MOORE, Robin. The Decline of Improvisation in Western Art Music: As interpretation of Change. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, v. 23, n. 1, p. 61-84, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/836956

NYMAN, Michael. Experimental Music: Cage and Beyond. 2° ed. Cambridge University Press, 1981.

PIOTROWSKA, Anna G. Expressing the Inexpressible: The Issue of Improvisation and the European Fascination with Gypsy Music in the 19th Century. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, v. 43, n. 2, p.325-341, 2012.

PRITCHETT, James. The music of John Cage. Cambridge University Press, 1996.

TAYLOR, Alan. ‘Collaboration’ in Contemporary Music: A Theoretical View. Contemporary Music Review, v. 35, p.1-17, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07494467.2016.1288316

WHITTALL, Arnold. Composer-performer collaborations in the long twentieth century. In: CLARKE, E. DOFFMAN, M. (Org). Distributed Creativity: Collaboration and Improvisation in Contemporary music. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017, p.21-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199355914.003.0002

Published

2023-07-14

How to Cite

Gouvea Pizaia, D., & Parra Furlanete, F. (2023). Performer openness strategies and the discourse control procedures. Vortex Music Journal, 11(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.33871/23179937.2023.11.2.7496

Issue

Section

Research Papers

Metrics