Between Immediacy and Persistence

Frustration, Teacher Mediation, and Mathematical Learning in the Digital Age

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33871/rpem.2026.15.36.11195

Abstract

This article analyzes how teacher mediation can transform mathematical frustration into a learning opportunity for Generation Z students in a context marked by the digital culture of immediacy. It is a theoretical-narrative essay based on classical and contemporary literature on emotions, mathematical learning, digital culture, and teacher education, with an emphasis on Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory and on studies of error, persistence, and mathematical understanding. The analysis argues that frustration should not be understood only as an obstacle to learning, but as an affective-cognitive experience that, when pedagogically mediated, may foster reflection, persistence, and conceptual elaboration. The text argues that mathematics teachers play a central role in reframing error, creating safe environments for trial and error, and promoting practices that value the time required for mathematical thinking. It concludes that teacher education needs to include strategies for mediating frustration, articulating emotional support, intellectual demand, and developing student autonomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jean Lucas da Silva Queiroz, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná

Mestre em Ensino, Ciências e Novas Tecnologias (2023) pela Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR). Licenciado em Física (UNIANDRADE-2017); Matemática (UNIBF-2022). Professor da educação básica em Porto Alegre.

Andressa Pivato, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre

Doutoranda e mestra em Biociências pela Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA). Bacharela em Engenharia Bioquímica pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG). Atualmente é Bolsista de Desenvolvimento Técnico e Industrial - Nível B.

References

AQUINO, J. G. (org.). Erro e fracasso na escola: alternativas teóricas e práticas. Campinas: Papirus, 1997.

AMORIM, L. C.; FONT MOLL, V.; GUSMÃO, T. C. R. S. Uma análise das emoções em práticas matemáticas a partir dos critérios de idoneidade didática. In: CONTRERAS, J. M.; ARTEAGA, P.; CAÑADAS, G. R.; GEA, M. M.; GIACOMONE, B.; LÓPEZ-MARTÍN, M. M. (ed.). Actas del Segundo Congreso International Virtual sobre el Enfoque Ontosemiótico del Conocimiento y la Instrucción Matemáticos. 2017. Disponível em: http://enfoqueontosemiotico.ugr.es/civeos/amorim.pdf. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

AMORIM, L. C.; GUSMÃO, T. C. R. S. Matemática e emoções: Um diálogo com professores da Educação Básica. In: COLÓQUIO NACIONAL DO MUSEU PEDAGÓGICO, 10., 2013, Vitória da Conquista. Anais [...]. Vitória da Conquista: UESB, 2013.

BLACKWELL, L. S.; TRZESNIEWSKI, K. H.; DWECK, C. S. Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, v. 78, n. 1, p. 246–263, 2007.

BOALER, J. Mathematical Mindsets: Unleashing Students’ Potential through Creative Math, Inspiring Messages and Innovative Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2016.

BORASI, R. Capitalizing on errors as “springboards for inquiry”: A teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, v. 25, n. 2, p. 166–208, 1994.

BOUCHER, D. Problem-Solving and Productive Struggle. Math Coach's Corner, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.mathcoachscorner.com/2021/12/problem-solving-and-productive-struggle/. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

BRASIL. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (Inep). Notas sobre o Brasil no Pisa 2022. Brasília, DF: Inep, 2023. Disponível em: https://download.inep.gov.br/acoes_internacionais/pisa/resultados/2022/pisa_2022_brazil_prt.pdf. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

CAIN, M. S.; MITROFF, S. R. Distractor filtering in media multitaskers. Perception, v. 40, n. 10, p. 1183-1192, 2011.

CAMPOS, A. M. A. de. Ansiedade matemática: fatores cognitivos e afetivos. Revista Psicopedagogia, [S. l.], v. 39, n. 119, p. 217–228, 2022. DOI: 10.51207/2179-4057.20220019. Disponível em: https://revistapsicopedagogia.com.br/revista/article/view/154. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

CLIFFORD, M. M. Failure tolerance and academic risk-taking in ten- to twelve-year-old students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 58, n. 1, p. 15–27, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00875.x. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

DIMOCK, Michael. Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, 17 jan. 2019. Disponível em: pewresearch.org. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

DRIJVERS, P. Digital Technology in Mathematics Education: Why It Works (Or Doesn’t). In: CHO, S. (org.). Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Cham: Springer, 2015. p. 135-151. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_8. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

DRIJVERS, P.; THURM, D.; VANDERVIEREN, E. et al. Distance mathematics education in Flanders, Germany, and the Netherlands during the COVID-19 lockdown. Educational Studies in Mathematics, v. 108, p. 35–64, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10094-5. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

DWECK, C. S. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Nova York: Random House, 2006.

HODGES, C.; MOORE, S.; LOCKEE, B.; TRUST, T.; BOND, A. The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educause Review, v. 27, mar. 2020. Disponível em: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

HOWARD-JONES, P. Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, v. 15, n. 12, p. 817–824, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

KAPUR, M. Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, v. 38, n. 6, p. 523–550, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9093-x. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

KIRSCHNER, P. A.; DE BRUYCKERE, P. The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, v. 67, p. 135–142, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

LEMBKE, A. Dopamine Nation: Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence. Nova York: Dutton, 2021.

MERCER, N.; LITTLETON, K. Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking. London: Routledge, 2007. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

MOON, J. A. Learning Journals: A Handbook for Reflective Practice and Professional Development. 2. ed. London: Routledge, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969212. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

OPHIR, E.; NASS, C.; WAGNER, A. D. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 106, n. 37, p. 15583–15587, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

PIAGET, J. A equilibração das estruturas cognitivas: problema central do desenvolvimento. Tradução de Álvaro Cabral. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1976.

SANTOS, J. R. V. dos; LINS, R. C. Movimentos de Teorizações em Educação Matemática. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, v. 30, n. 55, p. 325–367, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v30n55a02. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

SANTOS, S. M. dos; ALMEIDA, I. M. M. Z. P. de. Medo de Matemática e Trauma na Relação com o Aprender: uma leitura psicanalítica. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, v. 36, n. 74, p. 1273–1292, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v36n74a16. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

SCHOENFELD, A. H. What’s all the fuss about metacognition? In: SCHOENFELD, A. H. (ed.). Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987. p. 189-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062685. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

SCHÖN, D. The Reflective Practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.

SKEMP, R. R. Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, n. 77, p. 20-26, 1976.

SODERSTROM, N. C.; BJORK, R. A. Learning versus performance: an integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, v. 10, n. 2, p. 176–199, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

SWING, E. L.; GENTILE, D. A.; ANDERSON, C. A.; WALSH, D. A. Television and video game exposure and the development of attention problems. Pediatrics, v. 126, n. 2, p. 214–221, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1508. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

TANUS, V. L. F. A.; DARSIE, M. M. P. O erro como forma provisória do saber: um tratamento diferenciado no processo ensino-aprendizagem da matemática. Revista de Educação Pública, v. 21, n. 45, p. 169–189, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29286/rep.v21i45.338. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

TWENGE, J. M. iGen: Why Today's Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy—and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood—and What That Means for the Rest of Us. New York: Atria Books, 2017.

TWENGE, J. M. Generations: The Real Differences Between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents—and What They Mean for America’s Future. New York: Atria Books, 2023.

TWENGE, J. M.; CAMPBELL, W. K. Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents. Preventive Medicine Reports, v. 12, p. 271–283, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

VAN DE POL, J.; VOLMAN, M.; BEISHUIZEN, J. Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educ Psychol Rev 22, 271–296 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. A formação social da mente: o desenvolvimento dos processos psicológicos superiores. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1984.

WARSHAUER, Hiroko K. Strategies to Support Productive Struggle. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, v. 20, n. 7, p. 390-393, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/MATHTEACMIDDSCHO.20.7.0390. Acesso

Published

2026-06-12

How to Cite

da Silva Queiroz, J. L., & Pivato, A. (2026). Between Immediacy and Persistence: Frustration, Teacher Mediation, and Mathematical Learning in the Digital Age . Revista Paranaense De Educação Matemática, 15(36). https://doi.org/10.33871/rpem.2026.15.36.11195

Issue

Section

Artigos Científicos