Psychiatric politics and religious agency: notes on black boxes, the playful and the notion of in(ter)vention in mental health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33871/nupem.v11i24.683Keywords:
Psychiatric praxis, therapeutic praxis, religious agency, in(ter)vention.Abstract
This article reflects on complexities and black boxes, as Bruno Latour elaborated, here for mental health policies in Brazil. Black boxes are ‘machines’ that cannot be unraveled, a panacea of complexities. What I’m talking about is a black box of studies, and as a result, of the intervention in mental health. I discuss the deleterious (dis)articulation between attitude and conduct from a semantized view by the notions of psychiatric praxis, therapeutic praxis and religious agency. The starting point of the reflection is to consider that there is in this (de)articulation a regime established by empirical and epistemological inconsistencies, conditioned by the play I called in(ter)vention, based on the contribution of Roy Wagner, and to consider that intervention and invention are articulated and inseparable devices.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista NUPEM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.